Five-year-old Raina engages in a conversation with her mother as they walk alongside the countryside. At five-years-old Raina is able to have a conversation with her mother and seems comfortable as well as trusting as she assumes that her mom knows what is said. The mother is shown throughout this extract helping Raina and guiding her through the obstacles she had endured. The mother is also shown through the extract helping Raina by highlighting their surroundings and making them know. For example, the mother pointed out the ‘butterfly’ in the air; “see the butterfly (arrow) [points] LOOK.” Unfortunately, Raina missed the viewing of the creature, yet this still displays the mother's given aid. Raina’s mother assists her with another issue at hand. Raina wanted to, ‘go in this field’ but mother said ‘no.’ She said this because of the ‘long grass’ and how there could be ‘creepy crawlies’ in there. This mother helped her son so much and offered a lot of guidance.
Language Acquisition Support System is used. This system of language deals with the adults and older children who help a young child acquire language. Basically this system of in support of a ‘caregiver.’ This caregiving feature helps Raiana gain more insight into her surroundings. The mother helps Raiana countless times with seeing the animals and the area around her. For example, ‘see the butterfly [points] LOOK’, ‘over there (1) you missed it (1) LOOK (2)’, ‘look over in that tree there’, amongst many others. She acted as his caregiver and helped with his knowledge of his surroundings.
Considering Raina’s age, five, her language stage is preoperational. This Piaget theory focuses on ages two to five and deals with understanding the world through language and mental images. At this stage, kids learn through pretend play but still struggle with logic and taking the point of view of other people. They also often struggle with understanding the idea of constancy.
Raina's main stage of early development in child language acquisition would be the post telegraphic stage. In this stage, the remaining function words are acquired and appropriate. The telegraphic stage deals with a caregiver or individual asking questions and keeping the child engaged. For example, ‘do you hear them?’, ‘do you think there's a lot of little birdies in there?’ Those questions are actively keeping Raiana engaged with the more information she learns.
The conventions and features of unscripted conversation and spoken language transcripts retained a vast amount of notations. Pauses in seconds, micro-pauses, speech overlap, underlying, paralinguistic features, upper case letters, phonemic representation of speech sounds, along with upward and downward intonations. Each underlined word deals with location; there and this. Raina uses this lexis by amplifying to his mother that he ‘wants to go this way.’ The mother used there when telling how Raina missed seeing the butterfly. The second pauses along with the micro ones are mostly used by five-year-old Raina, but at times the mother does as well. “Look (.) this way (.) i’m going to (.) going to (.) go over here.” In this comment, we can clearly see just how many breaks this child is taking. He is stuttering with his words, probably because of his language level. In between the conversation, italics are used which display paralinguistic features. As the mother shows the different elements and animals to Raiana, she uses italics to show how she, ‘[points]’ to them. Inline twelve the mother used this feature to quote, ‘[breathes in].’ The pair also use these italics to display their emotions. In lines, twenty-nine and thirty, share a laugh together about spiders on Raina's jacket. During their exploration, each time one of them spotted something they would say, ‘LOOK.’ By this word being in all caps intensifies the importance. When they speak about directions of either the animals or places to go they use upward and downward intonations.
There were multiple different functions of children's language used in this extract. Heuristic language is used to explore the world and to learn and discover – children use language to learn. This function usually deals with questions and answers. Raina and his mother frequently asked questions; ‘see the butterfly?’, ‘mum can we skip this way?’ Not only is heuristic language shown but elements of representational, interactional, and personal.
Hey Madi,
ReplyDeleteFor AO1 I’m going to give you a total of 2 marks. The reason why is because you didn’t mention the author or even didn’t even mention the audience at all. If you mentioned the author or even brought up a ‘purpose’ of writing the text, then your score could’ve been brought up.
For AO4, the first bullet point, I’m going to give you 3 marks. You had a clear understanding of the method you have been used in the text such as using buzzwords like ‘telegraphic stage’ which is good to gain points.
The second bullet point you receive 3 points. You had a adequate use of wider study of linguistic choices which is good.
The third bullet point you get 4 points because you had a proficiency of using the theories such as ‘Piaget theory’ and ‘Language Acquisition Support System’ which is good to use to prove your point of well.
For AO5 you receive 3 points because you had an adequate use of a clear analysis which could’ve been improved.
Total: 15/25 Good work
The author of a conversation?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteAO1:
ReplyDelete2-3/5. You show a clear understanding of the meaning of the conversation that is held. You also go into detail about the context behind what is said and do a good job of explaining what is happening throughout the text.
AO4:
Here I would give you a 7. 'Pauses in seconds, micro-pauses, speech overlap, underlying, paralinguistic features, upper case letters, phonemic representation of speech sounds, along with upward and downward intonations.' Is not an adequate way to bring up points. Here you are only listing, not explaining. While you do explain some of these concepts later on, it is not coherent, which affects your AO1 and AO5 score as well.
AO5:
You show a good selection of elements that can be used, but it is not coherent and makes the analysis portion seem unclear and out of place.
DeleteHey Madi,
AO1: For this section, I would give you 3 marks. It was clear in your writing that you had an understanding of the text and you used multiple quotes throughout your writing that proved this. You had multiple insightful references to the text and you elaborated on them well.
AO4: For this section I would give you 10 marks. You referenced and spoke on “Language Acquisition Support System” and the “Piaget Theory.” This showed the reader that you knew what you were talking about and you were able to accurately speak on linguistic concepts and methods.
AO5: For this section I would also give you a 3 because you had a good amount of quotes and data. Next time I would recommend using a few more quotes in your writing in order to get a higher score. I would also say that you should shorten a few of your paragraphs because your second to last paragraph was a little bit too long. Other than that good job.
16/25
AO1: You displayed a clear understanding of the text within your blog, with meaning, context, and audience. For example, “The mother is shown throughout this extract helping Raina and guiding her through the obstacles she had endured.”. As well as providing clear reference to certain characteristic features. For example, “She acted as his caregiver and helped with his knowledge”. I give you 3 marks.
ReplyDeleteAO4: There was a clear understanding of linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches. As well as explicit references to a broader study of linguistic issues and concepts. For example, “This Piaget theory focuses on ages two to five” and “ Language Acquisition Support System is used.”. There was a clear reference to linguistic methods and approaches taken by appropriate theorists. I give you 9 marks.
AO5: There was a clear selection, analysis, and synthesis of language data. For example, “they would say, ‘LOOK.’” And “intensifies the importance.” I gave you three marks.